|
cameraworld
is a collaboration between Mikel Rouse and Cliff Baldwin incorporating
digital surround sound, moving images and media for home entertainment
systems of the future. These elements fuse to form the forthcoming feature
film cameraworld.
cameraworld
will pioneer a new form of all-digital entertainment. Fusing the minimalist
rap musings of Mikel Rouse and the reductionist roving eye of Cliff Baldwin,
cameraworld
takes the audience on a tour of our country that is at once familiar and
striking. As a kind of mobile surveillance, cameraworld viscerally
demonstrates that real people in real places can create compelling real
video and ultimately, real opera.
In ignoring storyline and placing emphasis on visually dynamic subject
matter, the visual component of cameraworld evolves organically.
cameraworld
goes In the search of the sublime suburban mall, the overcongested freeway,
high-traffic waterways, construction sites, offices and the occasional
movie set. Events are documented as they unfold and as they happen naturally.
With a Webcam sensibility and a perpetual urban bodygroove, cameraworld
sets the world on its ear and eye.
In the conceptual tradition of FluxFilms, Minimalism and the likes of
Michael Snow, Richard Serra and Steve Reich, cameraworld
picks up where the minimalist
music and video of the 70's left off and propels it into the next century.
Befitting the multilayered
nature of the two artists' work, cameraworld will exist in many dimensions,
from web broadcasts to feature film; from live media performance to stand-alone
cd and dvd.

January 30, 2000 / The New York Times
Television's New Voyeurism Pictures Real-Life Intimacy
By BILL CARTER he
European invasion began with "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire," which transformed
the competitive landscape of network television. Now, just months later,
a new wave of formats, all based on real-life experience voyeuristically
captured on camera, is coming from abroad.
The shows range from
examinations of people trying to survive on a desert island to people
trying to get along while locked together in various settings of forced
intimacy -- in a house, on a bus or a tourist vacation, in a home set
up to match conditions 100 years ago.
The shows, many of
which will have ambitious Internet components, have been described as
various combinations of MTV's cinéma vérité show "The Real World," the
syndicated talk show "Jerry Springer" and, of course, "Who Wants to Be
a Millionaire," which came from Britain. One show makes its Orwellian
aura overt: It is called "Big Brother."
Virtually all the
shows have been significant hits in European countries. "Big Brother"
is a phenomenon in Holland, even spawning a second series, a talk show
where the events on the show are exhaustively discussed.
It is the chance
for the networks -- which have been losing viewers to cable television
for at least a decade -- to create the kind of phenomenon in this country
that ABC did with "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire," which is driving network
executives to pursue the other inventive European television formats that
break the mold of comedies, dramas and news programs.
In fact, the bidding
for the American version of "Big Brother" reached a fever pitch last week,
with prices escalating to a point where one senior network executive labeled
the process "totally nuts." A deal for "Big Brother" is expected this
week, with CBS the front-runner. In a first, plans call for the show to
run for 100 consecutive nights in prime time.
That would give CBS
the first two examples of this genre, because the network is already deep
into its planning for a 13-episode summer series called "Survivor" --
a giant hit in Sweden -- in which 16 people will be stranded on an island
off Borneo in the Pacific Ocean, charged with finding ways to survive.
Cast members will be eliminated each week by vote of the other contestants
until one is the final survivor, winning $1 million. "Survivor" has lined
up eight sponsors, and they will be given product-placement opportunities.
For example, Reebok is a sponsor; the contestants will most likely be
wearing Reebok shoes.
Leslie Moonves, president
of CBS Television, said the move toward these wilder formats reflected
the network's conclusion that tried-and-true television, like situation
comedies on brightly lit Hollywood sound stages, now leaves many American
viewers cold.
"What's happening
is people are realizing you need to be different," Mr. Moonves said. "You
can't go with the same old meat and potatoes anymore. You've got to shake
things up. And clearly people are realizing it's a big world out there
and shows really can come from the other side of the Atlantic."
The reality shows
have an economic advantage over scripted series: they do not employ vast
numbers of writers and they have no expensive stars at all. That points
to a downside for Hollywood. Mr. Moonves said that every game show in
prime time cost the industry 100 jobs. Producers have already complained
that the proliferation of news magazines and game shows are radically
shrinking prime-time opportunities.
"There's no question
that if the reality shows take off there will be a contraction in the
business," he said. "There could be a real shift in who's working and
not working."
More than anything,
the move toward the European shows reflects the effect of "Millionaire,"
which has transformed the network prime-time ratings race, pulling ABC
from a likely third place this season to a near-certain first-place finish.
"Millionaire" has
already fathered a brood of game shows. Last year there were no game shows
on network prime time. Now there are eight hours of games each week. Because
"Millionaire" emerged from Britain as a fully developed hit, network executives
have started looking at other European shows.
One agent who has
been in the middle of many of the negotiations for these new programs,
Ben Silverman, head of international packaging for the William Morris
Agency, lived for more than four years in England.
"I scoured the TV
listings all over Europe looking for shows that sounded interesting,"
Mr. Silverman said. "The European producers don't come from the American
system. They don't have this track record that leads them to reject certain
ideas. They also don't have the infrastructure to support shows full of
writers and stars. So they have to find innovative stuff."
Mr. Silverman, along
with a William Morris partner in Los Angeles, Greg Lipstone, represented
the British company Celador in negotiations with ABC for "Millionaire,"
which was supposed to be nothing more than a summer series. After it became
a hit, Mr. Silverman started getting calls about other European properties
he had already lined up.
Even PBS called, securing
the rights to a show produced by a British company called Wall to Wall.
This one, "1900 House," involves bringing a family into a home with cameras
and making them live just as they would have a century ago -- without,
for example, television.
But "Big Brother,"
owned by the Dutch company Endemol Entertainment, is currently the hottest
property in this genre. Mark Itkin, the senior vice president of William
Morris for reality programs, said: "I had no idea the bidding would be
so hot. But the show has so many elements, from being on 100 days in a
row to an Internet component that is especially attractive to networks."
Mr. Silverman first
believed only a cable network would make the commitment to Endemol's format:
100 consecutive nights of "Big Brother." But after "Millionaire," three
big broadcast networks jumped into the bidding, each promising to broadcast
"Big Brother" essentially every single night this summer.
"Big Brother" throws
a group of 10 people, mostly in their 20's, into a new house constructed
with cameras and recording equipment everywhere to document their every
move. In Holland that included everything from showers to sex, though
an American version is clearly not going to go that far.
In Holland, the Internet
helped drive the show because users could log onto the show's Web site,
pick out certain characters and cameras, and literally watch 24 hours
a day.
Each week one cast
member is voted out, with viewers participating by phone and Internet.
The last cast member standing in Holland won 250,000 guilders, about $111,000.
Many of the elements are similar to "Survivor," so similar, that Mark
Burnett, who is producing "Survivor" for CBS, said the show's British
originators had filed suit against Endemol. The suit is pending. Mr. Burnett
described "Survivor" as "a little bit of 'Truman Show' and 'Lord of the
Flies,' with an edgy 'Gilligan's Island' thrown in." Currently Mr. Burnett
is whittling down the hundreds of applicants for "Survivor," using, among
other things, a battery of psychological tests. He hopes to avoid the
unfortunate outcome of the show's first edition in Sweden, when one cast
member committed suicide after being rejected by his comrades. And that
was in a format that was softer than the American version.
In Sweden, cast members
decided by voting whom they wanted to remain on the island. Mr. Burnett
acknowledged that the American version would be far more Darwinian. Individuals
will be voted out by the group. Though CBS may lead this trend, program
executives at the other networks are likely to try to come up with their
own, similar formats.
Mike Darnell, executive
vice president of special programs for Fox, has been highly inventive
in the reality arena, coming up with the concepts for everything from
the game show "Greed" to "When Good Pets Go Bad." He was also the man
behind the now-scrapped idea to crash a Boeing 747 live in the desert.
Mr. Darnell's latest brainstorm is a special, set for Feb. 15, called
"Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire," in which 50 female contestants will
be whittled down by beauty pageant-like contests and extensive interviewing
to five finalists, all in wedding gowns, one of whom will be proposed
to and married on the air, live, by a willing millionaire. "All these
shows are voyeuristic," Mr. Darnell said. "After a while they become soap
operas. That's why casting is so important. The people you pick will determine
whether you're a hit or a bomb." '
Robert Thompson, founder
of the Center for the Study of Popular Television at Syracuse University,
called the trend toward voyeurism shows an inevitable confluence of advances
in technology and basic human interest. "Popular culture is beginning
to catch up with our real behavior," Mr. Thompson said. "We all talk about
family values, but that's not how most of us operate as human beings.
In some ways, this is the programmers discovering what TV was always so
great at in the first place. This is Peeping Tom to the max."

|